Dita Charanzová

Age 44
email
facebook
twitter
web
Free Speech+0.5
Whistleblowing+1
Proportionality+0.5
Misinformation-1
Intimidation-0.5
Authoritarianism-1
Irresponsibility-1.5
Amendments
Alert
Against
Rejected
Directive
For
Passed
For
Against
Abstain
Absent
Amendments
312
317
24
98
Rejected
18 corrections
322
315
17
98
Passed
Alert
Directive
348
274
36
94
Passed
19 corrections
338
284
36
94
Passed
Alert
Undemocratic Results
Enough MEPs corrected their vote afterwards that the results should have been different.
Abstain

Abstained from considering amendments

Dita Charanzová abstained from the vote to consider individual amendments to the copyright directive.

Intimidation-0.5

Intimidation

Allowed extremely controversial proposals to be combined with ordinary reform.

For

Voted incorrectly on the contested amendments vote

Dita Charanzová changed her vote to 'For' after the fact. This would have affected the outcome.

Irresponsibility-1

Irresponsibility

Failed to represent her own will, let alone that of the people, with undemocratic consequences.

Abstain

Abstained from voting on the directive

Dita Charanzová abstained from voting on the copyright directive, despite unprecedented protest from the public and criticism from political and technical experts.

Irresponsibility-0.5

Irresponsibility

Unphased by expert and public opinion to take action.

Directive
For
Passed
For
Against
Abstain
Absent
Directive
591
29
33
98
Passed
2 corrections
591
29
33
98
Passed
For

Voted for the directive

Dita Charanzová voted to approve the directive that provides broad and strong protections for whistleblowers.

Whistleblowing+1

Whistleblowing

Supported a directive that mandates responsible disclosure in the public interest.

Amendment 157
Against
Rejected
Amendment 158
Against
Rejected
Amendment 159
Against
Rejected
Amendment 160
Against
Rejected
Amendment 161
Against
Rejected
Amendment 162
For
Passed
Amendment 164
Against
Rejected
Proposition
For
Passed
For
Against
Abstain
Absent
Amendment 157
297
300
10
145
Rejected
1 correction
296
301
10
145
Rejected
Amendment 158
298
305
6
143
Rejected
2 corrections
300
303
6
143
Rejected
Amendment 159
280
308
17
147
Rejected
3 corrections
283
305
17
147
Rejected
Amendment 160
285
312
13
142
Rejected
3 corrections
288
309
13
142
Rejected
Amendment 161
299
299
13
141
Rejected
Amendment 162
299
295
12
146
Passed
Amendment 164
262
310
29
150
Rejected
1 correction
262
311
29
150
Rejected
Proposition
308
204
70
167
Passed
5 corrections
312
203
70
167
Passed
Both For and Against

Voted to remove the strict 1 hour removal deadline (some amendments)

Dita Charanzová voted to remove the strict deadline that would require automated upload filters or 24/7 monitoring.(Votes: AgainstAgainstAgainstForForForAgainst)

Free Speech+0.5

Free Speech

Protected sensitive content from wrongful removal thanks to human oversight.

Proportionality+0.5

Proportionality

Favored a reasonable measure that allowed for individuals or small providers to comply.

For

Voted for the proposition

Dita Charanzová voted for the proposition, which introduced mandatory censorship by government authorities of "terrorist content" on the open internet, under penalty of harsh fines.

Authoritarianism-1

Authoritarianism

Used threats to public security to justify control of all published information.

Misinformation-1

Misinformation

Police had already issued unreasonable take-down notices against cultural archives.

Meep Meep Logo
Info

What's this?

Meep Meep catalogs various achievements and gaffes of our European politicians, in this modern world that confounds them so.

We informally rank Members of Parliament (MEPs) based on specific statements, decisions and events, focusing on issues relevant for the new political generation. Our core themes are:

  • Digital Freedom: Strong protections to live our digital lives
  • Enlightened Policy: Wise, fair and transparent policy making
  • Tolerant Humanism: Respectful and proportional rights and freedoms

Meep Meep is a young project, created in the run up to the 2019 European elections. We will continue to refine our model and add more data points.